🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that indecision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to find the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.